Guide ยท Shipper

Do we need a TMS to cut freight spend?

We're a manufacturer. Do we need a TMS to cut freight spend?

Probably not first. Freight spend moves with your routing guide and bid cadence long before it moves with software; a TMS pays off when the guide is designed and someone owns the decisions the data would change.

ASSUMEDWe assumed a manufacturer running freight from an ERP, spreadsheets and email, with carrier contracts in documents.

Your stack, as you described it

Where the work happens
Logistics team's spreadsheets
Carrier emails and tenders
Plant shipping desksASSUMED
The connections
Carrier tenders by email
ERP to carrier invoices by hand
Where the truth lives
ERP
Carrier contracts in documents
TMS or managed providerASSUMED

Where people are the glue

  • Awarded lanes that never see a load
  • Freight invoices audited by eye

Three ways through

  • Use what you haveStart here

    Fix the routing guide and run the bid with your real volumes. Many shippers do this with a managed transportation provider rather than owning software.

  • ConnectWhat we'd do next

    Connect the ERP to carriers and a visibility provider so tenders, status and invoices stop being emails; a TMS or a managed service sits in the middle.

  • BuildNot here

    Shippers build freight software only when freight is the business.

What happens next

  • A Transformation conversation on guide design, bid cadence and who owns the decisions.
  • Then selection, if a TMS is the answer.

Have a different stack? Ask the guide.

Ask a follow-up